APTCCARN Meeting

Press Coverage of the 5th APTCCARN Meeting | Natural Disasters and Cultural Heritage in the Philippines: Knowledge Sharing, Decision Making and Conservation

APTCCARN is delighted to share the news that the Philippine Government has issued a statement of affirmation to its commitment to the protection of the vitality of the country's cultural heritage. It comes following our 5th Meeting in Bohol from 4-6 April, at which we were deeply honoured to have Cabinet Secretary Leoncio Evasco deliver the Opening Message. Read the article here.

The 5th Meeting has also been covered in articles by Ben Rodin, Rebuilding Cultural Heritage After Disaster, on the University of Melbourne's online publication, Pursuit, and by Rey Anthony H Chiu, Heritage Experts Learn from Bohol's Conservation Efforts, in the One Visayas eNewsletter. The recap has also been published on the Australian Institute for the Conservation of Cultural Materials website. 

Recap of 5th APTCCARN Meeting | Natural Disasters and Cultural Heritage in the Philippines: Knowledge Sharing, Decision Making and Conservation

Dr Nicole Tse, Claire Grech, Sabine Cotte and Pam Soriano, Grimwade Centre for Cultural Materials Conservation, The University of Melbourne

Earlier this year in April, the 5th Asia Pacific Tropical Climate Conservation Art Research Network (APTCCARN) Forum was held in Bohol, Philippines and co-hosted by the National Museum of the Philippines, the Grimwade Centre for Cultural Materials Conservation and SEAMEO Regional Centre for Archaeology and Fine Arts. Again the event drew together over 60 participants from across the Asia Pacific region and focused on the practical aftermath and realities of disaster preparedness and recovery.

APTCCARN 5th Meeting crop.jpeg

Although this forum focussed on the central themes of APTCCARN to develop regionally relevant conservation responses, it differed from previous meetings in stressing the importance of knowledge sharing. In situating the conference in Bohol – an island in the centre of the Philippines- impacted by a major 2013 earthquake and the annual threat of floods and typhoons – awareness of the effect of natural disasters on cultural heritage, people and places, was ever present. It was a genuine chance to experience and hear the stories of the real events, journeys and future aspirations of parishioners, community, heritage professionals and spokespersons. The forum took the form of dynamic group activities and site visits, culminating in a series of practical sharing sessions and assessments for the ecclesiastical collections held by the Parishes in Maribojoc, Cortes, and Antequera.

The intended themes of the forum were disaster recovery and cultural materials conservation in the community; to investigate the dynamics of change; recent and shared experiences; and cultural materials salvage, rehabilitation, revitalisation and management. In truth, some of these were discussed more effectively and with more clarity than others, but what was most refreshing was the emergence of other themes. These resonated through many of the talks, starting with the opening sessions by the Honourable and Cabinet Secretary Leoncio Evasco Jr., and Governor Edgardo Chatto. Provincial Governor of Bohol. From the start with the unexpected weather and delay in flights of our opening keynotes, we were reminded of the need for flexibility and how unpredictable climates are part of the ‘new normal’. For the 5th APTCCARN, April was deliberately chosen as the last month of summer before the typhoon season, but this was clearly wrong.

IMG_6559.JPG

Themes such as flexibility, optimism and resilience of the Parishioners and community were central to discussions, which then transpired to the recovery and salvage efforts of the cultural heritage in the aftermath of the earthquake. Rather than relegating the damaged churches and collections to the status of a ruin, and in stabilising and building the social fabric of the community, the government and church now promote Bohol as a ‘heritage conservation laboratory’ and supports it as such. The scale of work is huge, but the will and investment is present, and the heritage destruction is being viewed as an opportunity to build new opportunities for a community of artists, youth and heritage workers. We certainly saw such work in the presentation by Mr Angel Bautista (National Museum of the Philippines) and Mr Larry Cruz (National Historical Commission of the Philippines) where within three years so much has been achieved. The scale and co-ordination is impressive. While sitting in the temporary parish of Maribojoc, we could at the same time experience the scale of the work and how quickly the site had been cleared, the ecclesiastical collections retrieved and temporary infrastructure put into place.

Overwhelmingly, the importance of community engagement, volunteerism, support, and participation was highlighted as integral to the success of recovery efforts. This was exemplified in the cases of Maribojoc Parish and the tireless efforts of Ma’am Fe and StarDust volunteers, the Mayor of Cortes, and Ms Perlina Alo at Baclayon Church. The people in the parishes of Maribojoc, Antequera and Cortes kindly opened their storage places and explained the various issues they encountered post disaster recovery; we thank them deeply for this.

IMG_7489.JPG
IMG_7341.JPG

It was also ratifying for Dr Rujaya Abhakorn, Centre Director of SEAMEO SPAFA, to provide a background and framework for the collaboration and support for the ASEAN delegates from Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, Thailand and Vietnam. SEAMEO SPAFA participation also celebrates the 50 years of ASEAN, with the Philippines as the official chair, emphasising regional approaches. While the collaboration between the National Museum of the Philippines and the University of Melbourne celebrates 70 years of diplomatic relations between the Philippines and Australia. And the University of Melbourne has a long relationship with the Province of Bohol, having first worked with Father Ted Torralba 20 years ago on church heritage. We were reminded that political value and policy alignment are necessary mechanisms for cultural conservation work.

We were treated to Father Ted’s humorous and insightful keynote. His sermon was thought provoking and entertaining, and he recounted how his lengthy sermons often went over lunch. Again resilience and opportunity resonated with Bohol viewed as a ‘heritage conservation laboratory’ having moved on from its earlier classification as ‘Bohol as the centre of Church heritage’. The intention to Build Bohol Back Better (also echoing Sabine Cotte’s talk on Nepal) and the laboratory as a place for improvement, highlights the leadership of the Diocese of Tagbilaran. Director Jeremy Barns from the National Museum, commented on the value and opportunity for capacity building that the disasters had in effect created. Many of us would remember the raw experiences Father Ted and Jeremy Barnes first shared with us at ICOM-CC Melbourne in 2014.

In true Asian diplomacy, we shared ideas and ate well. Overall there was diverse and wide ranging experiences of disasters and their effects on heritage from Australia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, Nepal, Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam.

IMG_7278.JPG

Talks by local experts included Professor Maricor Soriano’s imaging of Spanish-era maps of Metro Manila and Cebu in order to discover lost bodies of water, that may pose a threat to human life and cultural heritage during flooding events; Ms Maria Lourdes Po’s presentation on the importance of documentation in the everyday preventive care of collections, and how documentation can be mobilised to assist during disaster preparation and recovery efforts of collections; and Ms Josephine Francisco’s practical guide to caring for paper-based objects following disasters, including recommendations of equipment and resources. Mr Robert Balarbar exposed the resource realities of disaster response and the difference between the risks immediately after the event (event risks) and the risks to the collection after the initial allocation of funds, time and resources has waned (progressive risk). Engineer Jainab Aimee Tahil-Altillero argued the case for and provided an example of interdisciplinary teams and their benefits during disaster response.

The SEAMEO SPAFA session papers highlighted the myriad of disasters that collections in Southeast Asia have suffered, and the resilience and ingenuity used to prepare, salvage, and conserve collections for these events, including an inspired storage cage to secure objects during earthquakes presented by Ms Septina Wardhani. While the risks associated with flooding and potential for damage was highlighted by Ms Thi Anh Van Huynh from Vietnam and Ms Puangporn Srisomboon from Thailand, the latter who also demonstrated the necessity of understanding damage through conservation science in order to facilitate conservation of objects. Mr Thein Lwin from Myanmar presented the conservation and restoration works that have been undertaken on Bagan Cultural Heritage Region following the 6.5 magnitude earthquake in August, 2016. Mr Zamrul Amri bin Zakaria’s talk revealed how not all countries in the region have been devastated by natural disasters, such as Malaysia, but how all needed to have disaster plans in place in this era of climate change so that we can be prepared for uncertainties.

Other talks by Anne Carter, Christine Ianna, and Professor Robyn Sloggett highlighted the vulnerability of Australian collections to flooding, and the preventive and recovery efforts taken on an institution and community/personal level, and the importance of at-distance support networks. This was also echoed in the presentations by Ms Pattayarach Thamwongsa and Ms Wanvisa Woraward, whose talk was situated in the context of Thailand’s expansive network of local museums, and strategies for building capacity through dissemination of conservation and preservation knowledge in an accessible and relevant way. While informative presentations on seismic risk and preventive strategies were given by Ms Amy Heffernan of the Grimwade Centre.

We want to sustain this collaboration and continue these conversations. To this effect, we will upload some of the resource documents on the APTCCARN website shortly, and you can see the @aptccarn_ , @aptccarn, #aptccarn tags from the forum curated by Asialink Resident Rosie Cook now in Taiwan.

The local organising is thanked deeply especially Assistant Director Dr Ana Labrador of the National Museum and her team Engineer Jainab Aimee Altillero, Robert Balarbar, Camille, Michelle, Sunshine, and Dominic and the National Museum Field Office of Tagbilaran Ms Athena Vitor, Engr. and MC Joel Dahiroc, and Mr Charlie Tantingco.

Finally the forum was made possible with the support of the Australian Government through the Australian-ASEAN Council of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, the Diocese of Bohol and Provincial Government of Bohol. Four young Australian conservators continued their work in Bohol after the forum with the support of DFAT and Rosie Cook, Amy Heffernan, Elizabeth Long and Karen Wilcox will report on this soon.

Thank you everyone and until the next APTCCARN (so far we have been in Malaysia, Thailand, Taiwan and Australia).

Testimonial of the 4th APTCCARN Meeting

The APTCCARN meeting proved to be an excellent opportunity for me to meet professionals working in the field of conservation in Southeast Asia. The atmosphere was warm, welcoming, enthusiastic and friendly. It was my aim and I very much enjoyed hearing about the specific challenges our profession is confronted with in tropical climates. As an emerging conservator who is focusing her work on European museum collections of Southeast Asian art and heritage, I feel obliged to reach out, come in contact and present myself and my research internationally. APTCCARN's key message and insight for me was, that conservators in Southeast Asia are evidently shifting from an object- to a community-based conservation approach. 

Kind greetings to you and again many thanks! 

Eva Christiane von Reumont

MA student at the University of Arts Bern   
Conservation of non-European Cultural Heritage
– Polychrome Paintings and Sculptures –

Welcome Message from the 5th APTCCARN Meeting | Natural Disasters & Cultural Heritage in the Philippines: Knowledge Sharing, Decision Making & Conservation

From the 5th APTCCARN Organising Committee

Dr Ana Labrador, Founding Member APTCCARN and Assistant Director, National Museum

Dr Nicole Tse, Founding Member, APTCCARN and the Grimwade Centre for Cultural Materials Conservation, The University of Melbourne

Claire Grech, 5th APTCCARN Organising Committee and PhD Candidate, the Grimwade Centre for Cultural Materials Conservation, The University of Melbourne

P1480125.JPG

Welcome to the 5th APTCCARN Meeting in Tagbilaran City, Province of Bohol, hosted by the National Museum, Philippines, in collaboration with the Grimwade Centre for Cultural Materials Conservation, the University of Melbourne and the Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization Regional Centre for Archaeology and Fine Arts (SEAMEO SPAFA).

Since the Asia Pacific Tropical Climate Conservation Art Research Network’s (APTCCARN) inauguration in 2009 at the Balai Seni Negara (National Art Gallery in Malaysia), we have held meetings at the University of Melbourne in Australia, Silpakorn University in Thailand, and Cheng Shiu University in Taiwan. APTCCARN was established in recognition of the need to support a geographically focussed practice of cultural materials conservation in the Asia Pacific and a maturing discipline. Over eight years APTCCARN has built a community of practice from which approaches are emerging and revealing important information about the culture and conditions in the region. It was during the 4th Meeting in Taiwan that the impetus for this meeting arose, where delegates felt the urge to take the knowledge that had been shared and take action in an area of significant need.

This meeting’s focus on the effect of natural disasters on cultural heritage, people, and places is more than pertinent. Here in the Province of Bohol, Philippines, the impact of the 2013 earthquake at 7.2 magnitude is clearly evident, which was soon followed by Typhoon Haiyan and its devastating effects across the Philippines. During the forum, we will hear the stories of the real events, journeys, and future aspirations, being central to the lives of Boholanos. Cultural materials conservation only has purpose as a mindful community of practice and one that is engaged with people, diverse communities, and the global society. So the intended focus of the 5th APTCCARN forum is on people‐to‐people linkages across a diverse range of skills, capabilities, and experiences of cultural heritage recovery and disaster management, in Bohol, Southeast Asia, and beyond. This is critical to the salvage, rehabilitation, and sustained management of Bohol’s cultural assets and heritage, and assets wider afield that will be presented here at the forum.

We know that Southeast Asian nations continue to be among the most vulnerable to climate change, including increases in frequency and severity of extreme weather events. Reported disasters have risen sharply in the recent decade according to the World Disasters Report 2005 of the International Red Cross 2005. The Asia-Pacific region itself is ‘highly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change and national hazards’ and the Asian Development Bank has ‘pointed out that ‘heat waves, droughts, floods, and tropical cyclones have been more intense and frequent, causing extensive damage to property, assets, and human life’ (Parr, La Viña & Henry 2016, p. 2). While in 2013, most forum participants would know that the Philippines was ranked on the Global Climate Risk Index as the most affected country by extreme weather events, and was ranked 5th overall on a twenty-year time scale (1994-2013). People, places and cultural assets are vulnerable, subject to unpredictable events and uncertainty, which strikes at the core aims of cultural materials conservation, and what we hope to sustain and manage.

So this forum, led by community knowledge holders and cultural heritage practitioners, aims to share recent experiences of natural disasters and cultural heritage recovery projects to communicate and generate ideas around cultural heritage management and its associated uncertainties. With a primary focus on movable cultural heritage, discussions and presentations will include active participation and learning for Asian Pacific participants working in the field of cultural heritage and education, as well as local and international heritage professionals, interested individuals, and Parish communities. It is through these study visits, sharing sessions, group activities and presentations, that meaningful exchanges will take place, and strengthen and expand the APTCCARN network.

The 5th APTCCARN Committee is delighted that the National Museum is hosting this event. Dr Ana Labrador and the local organising committee have worked tirelessly over the past year to arrange the event details to its perfection. Hosting an international event like this takes a lot of commitment and attention to detail, and we deeply thank them. We thank Dr Rujaya Abhakorn, Centre Director of SEAMEO SPAFA, and staff for his opening speech and engaging vision of cultural heritage in the region. Further thanks is extended to our Keynote Speaker, Father Milan Ted Torralba. We thank the Province of Bohol, the parishes of Maribojoc, Cortes, Antequera, and Baclayon for hosting us, and insightful welcome speeches from Governor Edgardo Chatto, and of course Cabinet Secretary Leoncio Evasco Jr, known for his strong and faithful presence in Bohol. Lastly thank you to Diocese of Bohol and Bishop Alberto S. Uy for supporting the forum and making us feel welcome, and our major sponsor the Australian ASEAN Council. Thank you to all speakers, chairs and participants for attending the 5th APTCCARN Meeting on ‘Natural disasters and cultural heritage in the Philippines: Knowledge Sharing, Decision Making and Conservation’. We look forward to the sharing of knowledge and future exchanges.

Download the program here.

 

References

• Kreft, S, Eckstein, D, Junghans, L, Kerestan, C & Hagen, U 2015, Global Climate Risk Index 2015 Who suffers most from extreme weather events? Weather-related loss events in 2013 and 1994 to 2013, Briefing Paper, GermanWatch e.V., 32pp, <http://germanwatch.org/en/download/10333.pdf>

• International Red Cross 2005, World Disasters Report, International Red Cross.

• Parr, B, La Viña, AGM & Henry, D 2016, Philippines climate change agenda: High vulnerability! High ambition?, Briefing Paper 4, Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute, 16pp,< www.sustainable.unimelb.edu.au>.

Originally published online 19 April, 2017

Recap of the 4th APTCCARN Meeting | Embracing Cultural Materials Conservation in the Tropics

Julia Brennan, Textile Conservator

Attracting 100 participants from ten countries, and a large contingent from Taiwan, the forum was an energetic, diverse, informative, and congenial gathering. APTCCARN is unique– it is low key and congenial, and attendees all get to know one another. After every talk there were questions and discussions! Younger conservators and people interested in conservation, felt welcome and part of the dialogue, and many wonderful coffee breaks and fun dinners and field trip outings arranged by the university. Talks were presented by established and emerging conservators being a supported environment for the sharing of ideas and the mentoring of the next generation of conservators and heritage professionals.

 Living up to its reputation this meeting brought together people who are concerned with preserving cultural heritage in hot sticky climates, and attendees bonded in shared efforts to deal with these particular circumstances. Whether from Hong Kong, Philippines, Taiwan, or Thailand– everyone felt the common challenges of trying to preserve paintings, wood, drawings, textiles and metal with high humidity, insects and the monsoon weather patterns. Moreover, many work in circumstances that shape conservation daily work differently from colleagues in Europe or the USA. Much of APTCCARN’s attendees’ work is community oriented and driven; making decisions with elders, and clergy, and indigenous leaders, and small rural museum directors. The context, soil, climate, religion, language all shape the way conservation projects are directed, whether surveys or treatment. So, everyone joined in a spirit of mutual respect, recognising that the cultural context is paramount in daily work to successfully preserve the past for the future.

Leading the meeting was the local organising committee that included staff from Cheng Shiu University and the APTCCARN Organising Committee. Together they ensured everything ran smoothly, papers were kept to time, breaks were perfectly timed and visits and transfers well organised. Dr Ioseba Soraluze from the Conservation Center at Cheng Shiu University gave several papers along with his colleagues Tai Chun-shan and Lee Meng-ken. They also organised a fabulous paintings exhibition of Chen Cheng Po and the X-rays of his works, as well as made everyone feel welcome. A big congratulations to Ioseba and his colleagues from the Cheng Shiu Conservation Centre, who planned such an interesting and enjoyable conference, and worked so hard.  

New committee members have joined to work on the next APTCCARN meeting, slated for the Philippines. Diana Tay from Singapore is managing the website to include the program, attendees names and keep the momentum of this great forum going.

HIGHLIGHTS: 

  • Dr Rujaya Abhakorn, Director of SEAMEO SPAFA, BANGKOK, gave encouraging  welcome remarks and reminded us all that this forum has a growing base in SEA. A stalwart supporter of APTCCARN, Ajarn as we know him, gives this meeting a continuity that is vital.

  • A knock-it-out-of-the-ballpark performance-art lecture by Professor Hsiao Chong rui, about the famed Taiwanese artist Chen Cheng Po. Music pianissimo, and crescendo, photos of painting details, and life in 1920’s Shanghai and Tokyo, an oratory and dramatic piece that drew the audience into the brush stroke and colour, and tragedy and triumph of this romantic painter – even with the minimal translation (she did a great job for someone on the job for 90 minutes!) we could feel the seduction of his words. Spectacular key note.

  • “Looking Through the Xray” - The Chen Cheng Po exhibit of paintings, coupled with X-rays revealing the artists’ change of mind, re use of canvas, concealing of a nude or two, thrift and love of painting was the ‘cherry on the cake’. Exquisite small canvases, many of them nudes that rival Chagall, Cezanne, and express the artist’s local town of Chaiyi or Shanghai. Beautifully installed, leaving walking space to reflect and pause between paintings and our own revelations. This exhibit was the first I’ve ever seen anywhere, showing the juxtaposition of painting and X-ray, to reveal such clear artist’s working process. Here, the value of conservation analysis was put on view, paraded, with a clear value for everyone.

  • Really really good pastries at every break! Wow.Wonderful Cheng Shiu University students to help everyone and just hang and chat.

  • The BEST GRAND HOTEL ever. Wow. In itself, a historic 1950 example of political power and everything Chinese. Red lipstick like columns towering along the front of a sweeping roof palace. A lake, Olympic swimming pool, tennis courts and golf course, dining rooms and elegant chrysanthemum carpets, and hard wood floors that shone from 60 years of soft polishing. The conference dinner was a spectacle of local university, dance, acrobatics, massive jovial god characters, 8 course dinner, and of course our group photos! What a symbolic place to celebrate! 

Papers

  • A photo of a Catholic religious procession in the Philippines; women carrying a statue of Jesus, in the aftermath of typhoons and total loss of homes, family, food, and community. The faces personified the devotion, the sense of necessary protection and preservation that communities muster in the face of disaster. This photo is haunting. The story will continue and repeat sadly. But here is our wake up call. Triage. Co teaching. Sustainable solutions. Cross training. Community. As a community of skilled custodians and conservators, local emergency systems and models are being resolving themselves.

  • DISASTER AND FLOODING, MOULD AND SALTS- these ongoing repeated problems in Southeast Asia were a theme. It’s not the once in a century flood, but every year now. Our work as conservators, architects, teachers, is all intrinsically connected to climate change, global warming, massive industrialisation, de forestation, over fishing, corporate domination, government malaise…..Thai ministry of culture unable to conduct emergency work on multiple temples during seasonal flooding or massive tragic flooding in 2011. Salts and mould, peeling paint and murals, frustrated monk custodians, lack of budgets, lack of analysis or even sand bags, analysis too slow so drying and restoration is done without a collaborative forum. Ajarn Chiraporn Aranyanark’s several talks dovetailed with other colleagues from Thailand, with Dr Shin Maekawa from the Getty conservation Institute, with Dr Ana Labrador from the National Museum of the Phillipines. When disaster strikes, we pull together, but resources need to be rationalised and appropriately mobilised. How can we plan for what is now the ‘new normal’? 

  • PASSIVE CLIMATE –We have forgotten how clever, how climate sensitive our predecessors were, just 75 years ago. Human comfort, and massive urban development, have promoted air con, the model of the pan Asian hotel and office unit. A 24/7 model that works when the corporations are paying. But museums and collections over and over again shut themselves up into concrete blocks, with poorly designed AC HVAC systems with NO heating or humidification components. Electricity fails, no generators, the government sheds the power, the local director has to save money and switches off the power, and repeatedly– the perfect roller coaster of humidity swings of 20-30 degrees daily, which grow mould, mildew, millions of exotic spores, spiders, silver fish.

  • Arjan Chiraporn informed everyone of the enormous power and electric bills of various museums and collections in Bangkok, which still do not maintain a steady RH or temperature, and invite conservation disasters. In one case, a BKK based museum spends over $100,000 US per month on air conditioning. Cut off at night, as it is for the human comfort only. As Asian museums proliferate, thinking about long term environmental planning, sustainable architecture, protection of the collections, and training of a group of custodians who are connected to social media, colleagues in SEA, and talk about the way forward, trainings in more holistic collections management. Clearly, we all share a huge concern for the collections environment.

  • There were many papers from Chulalonkorn and Silpakorn Universities, as well as the National Discovery Centre and Queen Sirikit Museum of Textiles in Bangkok. Conservation research is growing in strength as the Thai researchers are building knowledge and building partnerships to solve their problems.

  • PRACTICALITY AND ALTERNATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES FOR HOT HUMID CLIMATES- Dr Shin Maekawa, co author with Michael Henry and Vincent Beltran, gave a very inspirational talk about the potential to change the architectural paradigm in hot sticky climates. What a ‘refreshing’ talk literally. Change the use of local data of RH and temperature to use historic averages, question the over design of museums and collection spaces, and utilise new models that employ heating and dehumidification to achieve more suitable local results. Shin proposed a workshop in alternative conservation strategies for hot and humid climates architecture and renovations of museums. More on this later as discussions take place.

  • The theme of alternative environmental strategies, was addressed by a French conservator, working with paintings and ‘colonial housing’ in Madagascar and Reunion. Sarah Davarinche came from France, because of the theme of preserving cultural materials in the tropics. While her thesis was focused on a painting, it was really about location, community, vernacular architecture, an openness to the local conditions and how to augment and utilise them. Here, she made a call to the old ‘colonial’ models of open architecture with air circulation, directional cross breezes, ventilated hallways, increased human intervention and care –– passive climate.

  • It was great to see so many of Singapore’s Heritage Conservation Centre HCC staff at APTCCARN! HCC announced the expansion of their analytical and research labs, with Hanna Szczepanowska, formerly of Smithsonian, as well as Miki Komatsu, Sylvia Haliman, Sarah Benson, and Cindy Lau. This expanded resource will hopefully collaborate with other SEA collections and solve some age-old questions.

  • Circling back to community, and the challenges when collections end up far from their sources or areas of production and use. Emily Keppel, of the University of Melbourne program, gave a fascinating talk. Handed a collection of 19th c Islamic manuscripts and books, her nascent investigation is sensitive, inquisitive, and modest. The underpinnings of cultural context, is evident here – her work to date is object based research, leading to action, and collaboration. 

  • COMMUNITY – Sophie Lewincamp set the tone on morning day 1 talking about working together with aboriginal communities in Australia, to conserve, analyse, and set a future course for their paintings. Her talk was a model for many, who need to actively listen and learn from the people we work with, whose heritage we are asked to advise about.

  • Other interesting talks included treatment comparisons of Taiwan paintings, drawings, railway tracings, books that all need to be archived, and often conserved. The examination of ‘Asian’ methods, those have historically been used to restore paper and painting, were compared and challenged with ‘western’ methods. Several conservators explored the use of alternative materials such as modern foam boards instead of wood panels; and the modification of backing boards for paintings and paper.

Originally published online 29 January, 2016